{"id":1331,"date":"2011-03-02T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-02T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/?p=1331"},"modified":"2011-03-02T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-03-02T12:00:00","slug":"anayasa-mahkemesi-onunde-basin-aciklamasi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/?p=1331","title":{"rendered":"Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00d6n\u00fcnde Bas\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ayhan \u00c7ivi, 4\/C personelinin, Anayasa Mahkemesinin yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fmesi nedeniyle karar\u0131n gecikti\u011fi ve se\u00e7im sonras\u0131na kalaca\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirmeler yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten \u00c7ivi, kamu vicdan\u0131ndaki teredd\u00fctlerin giderilmesi i\u00e7in Anayasa Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ha\u015fim K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7&#8217;\u0131n konuyu bir an \u00f6nce g\u00fcndeme almas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n<p>HAKSEN Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ayhan \u00c7ivi, d\u00f6rt ki\u015filik bir ailenin, sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 ve dengeli beslenebilmesi i\u00e7in yapmas\u0131 gereken ve a\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan harcama tutar\u0131n\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k 890 TL olarak hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve 2011 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm maa\u015f art\u0131\u015flar\u0131 dahil \u00fcniversite mezunu bir 4\/C&#8217;linin eline ayl\u0131k ortalama en fazla 916 TL \u00fccret ge\u00e7ti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek, &#8220;Bu 4\/C&#8217;li personelin geriye kalan 26 TL ile e\u011fitim, sa\u011fl\u0131k, ula\u015f\u0131m, bar\u0131nma, giyim, \u0131s\u0131nma, ula\u015f\u0131m, haberle\u015fme ve di\u011fer insani ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r&#8221; dedi. <\/p>\n<p>Kamu \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 Hak Sendikalar\u0131 Konfederasyonu (HAKSEN) Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ayhan \u00c7ivi, d\u00f6rt ki\u015filik bir ailenin, sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 ve dengeli beslenebilmesi i\u00e7in yapmas\u0131 gereken ve a\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan harcama tutar\u0131n\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k 890 TL olarak hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve 2011 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm maa\u015f art\u0131\u015flar\u0131 dahil \u00fcniversite mezunu bir 4\/C&#8217;linin eline ayl\u0131k ortalama en fazla 916 TL \u00fccret ge\u00e7ti\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek, &#8220;Bu 4\/C&#8217;li personelin geriye kalan 26 TL ile e\u011fitim, sa\u011fl\u0131k, ula\u015f\u0131m, bar\u0131nma, giyim, \u0131s\u0131nma, ula\u015f\u0131m, haberle\u015fme ve di\u011fer insani ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r&#8221; dedi. <\/p>\n<p>HAKSEN Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u00c7ivi, Anayasa Mahkemesinde bekleyen &#8220;4\/C iptal ba\u015fvurusu&#8221; ve 4\/C&#8217;li personelin sorunlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde bir bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapt\u0131. \u00c7ivi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada, T\u00fcrkiye \u0130statistik Kurumunda 19 y\u0131l 4\/C stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde anket\u00f6r olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131ktan sonra iste\u011fi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 dahi \u00f6denmeden emekliye sevk edilen HAKSEN \u00fcyesi Sabahattin G\u00fcrler ad\u0131na sendikalar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ilgili Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ve y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in 2009 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131nda Dan\u0131\u015ftay 2. Dairesine dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu davaya ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen m\u00fccadelede kendi Konfederasyonlar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka kimsenin bir pay\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savundu.<\/p>\n<p>\u00c7ivi, &#8220;Dan\u0131\u015ftay 2. Dairesince y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131n reddi nedeniyle Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kuruluna yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z itiraz sonucu Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulunun 24 Mart 2010 tarihinde ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararla, 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 4\/C maddesinin Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n 7 maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iptali istemiyle Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r&#8221; dedi. \u00c7ivi, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 20 May\u0131s 2010 tarihindeki ilk incelemesinde 4\/C iptal ba\u015fvurusunu esastan inceleme karar\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve 10 aydan beri s\u00f6z konusu incelemenin devam etti\u011fini vurgulad\u0131. <\/p>\n<p>-44 B\u0130N 4\/C&#8217;L\u0130N\u0130N G\u00d6Z\u00dc KULA\u011eI Y\u00dcKSEK MAHKEMEDE- <\/p>\n<p>44 bin civar\u0131ndaki 4\/C&#8217;li personelin beklentisine cevap verilmesi gerekti\u011fini ifade eden \u00c7ivi, &#8220;Zira, herhangi bir yasal d\u00fczenleme olmadan sadece her y\u0131l \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131yla belirlenen ko\u015fullarla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan binlerce 4\/C personeline yap\u0131lan keyfi uygulamalar nedeniyle onlarca uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konular\u0131 her ge\u00e7en g\u00fcn artmaktad\u0131r&#8221; diye konu\u015ftu. <\/p>\n<p>Sendikalar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7e\u015fitli hususlarda 4\/C personeli ad\u0131na \u0130dari yarg\u0131ya yapt\u0131klar\u0131 onlarca ba\u015fvurunun sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin karar\u0131n\u0131n beklendi\u011fini savunan \u00c7ivi, &#8220;Bu ba\u015fvurular her ge\u00e7en g\u00fcn de artarak devam etmektedir. Bir taraftan 4\/C personelinin hak kayb\u0131 devam ederken di\u011fer yandan idari yarg\u0131ya me\u015fgul etmektedir&#8221; \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu. <\/p>\n<p>-&#8220;4\/C&#8217;L\u0130LERE M\u00dcLTEC\u0130 MUAMELES\u0130 YAPILIYOR&#8221;- <\/p>\n<p>Kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda s\u00f6zde ge\u00e7ici ve mevsimlik i\u015flerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmak amac\u0131yla istihdam edilen binlerce 4\/C personelinin kamudaki di\u011fer memurlarla birlikte s\u00fcrekli hizmetlerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, herhangi bir yasa olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle 4\/C&#8217;li personele &#8220;k\u00f6le ve m\u00fclteci&#8221; muamelesi yap\u0131lmakta olundu\u011funu ifade eden \u00c7ivi, &#8220;4\/C&#8217;liler ayn\u0131 i\u015fi yapt\u0131klar\u0131 memurlara g\u00f6re yar\u0131 \u00fccretle ve hi\u00e7bir sosyal yard\u0131m \u00f6denmeden \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Kamu y\u00f6neticileri kurallar\u0131 ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 kendileri belirlemekte ve personeli buna uymaya zorlamaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6ylesi bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00fczeninin \u00f6zel sekt\u00f6rde dahi s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. 4\/C personelinin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ekonomik ve sosyal hakk\u0131 yarg\u0131ya ta\u015f\u0131nmak zorunda b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. B\u00f6ylesine ihtilafl\u0131 ve tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 bir stat\u00fc ile binlerce insan\u0131n gelece\u011fi t\u00fcketilmektedir&#8221; dedi. <\/p>\n<p>-&#8220;4\/C&#8217;L\u0130LER A\u00c7LI\u011eA MAHKUM ED\u0130LD\u0130&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>T\u00fcrk-\u0130\u015f taraf\u0131ndan 29 \u015eubat 2011 tarihinde yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada, d\u00f6rt ki\u015filik bir ailenin, sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 ve dengeli beslenebilmesi i\u00e7in yapmas\u0131 gereken ve a\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan harcama tutar\u0131n\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k 890 TL olarak hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve 2011 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm maa\u015f art\u0131\u015flar\u0131 dahil \u00fcniversite mezunu bir 4\/C&#8217;linin eline ayl\u0131k ortalama en fazla 916 TL \u00fccret \u00f6dendi\u011fini s\u00f6yleyen \u00c7ivi, &#8220;Bu 4\/C&#8217;li personelin geriye kalan 26 TL ile e\u011fitim, sa\u011fl\u0131k, ula\u015f\u0131m, bar\u0131nma, giyim , \u0131s\u0131nma , ula\u015f\u0131m , haberle\u015fme di\u011fer insani ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu nedenle, 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 4\/C maddesine g\u00f6re g\u00f6rev yapan ge\u00e7ici personel aras\u0131ndaki temel \u00fccret farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giderilerek, en d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck memur maa\u015f\u0131 d\u00fczeyine \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir&#8221; diye konu\u015ftu. <\/p>\n<p>-&#8220;\u00dcLKEM\u0130Z BU AYIPTAN KURTARILMALI&#8221;- <\/p>\n<p>D\u00fcnyada hi\u00e7bir \u00f6rne\u011fi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi 4\/C ay\u0131b\u0131ndan T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;nin kurtar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep eden \u00c7ivi, &#8220;\u00dclkemizde 39 y\u0131ldan beri y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 4\/C maddesini kald\u0131rmak ve bu d\u00fczene son vermek hi\u00e7bir siyasal iktidar taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Biz bu konudaki ma\u011fdurlar ad\u0131na adalete s\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131yoruz. Y\u00fcksek Mahkemenin bir an evvel ve \u00f6ncelikle 44 bin ki\u015finin \u00e7ekti\u011fi \u0131zd\u0131raba son verecek adil bir karar verece\u011fine inan\u0131yoruz. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, gecikmi\u015f adalet adalet de\u011fildir&#8221; dedi. <\/p>\n<h2 style='margin:20px 0;'>\u0130\u00e7erik Galerisi<\/h2>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/987876159.jpg\" alt=\"Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00d6n\u00fcnde Bas\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131\" style=\"width:100%;\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/214345751.jpg\" alt=\"Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00d6n\u00fcnde Bas\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131\" style=\"width:100%;\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Genel Ba\u015fkan Ayhan \u00c7ivi, beraberindeki sendika y\u00f6neticileri ve 4\/C li \u00fcyelerle birlikte  Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde kitlesel bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapt\u0131\u00e7<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1332,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1331"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1331\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}