{"id":1060,"date":"2010-08-06T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-06T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/?p=1060"},"modified":"2010-08-06T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-08-06T12:00:00","slug":"civi-sgkda-feragatin-bedeli-kisi-basina-300-tl","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/?p=1060","title":{"rendered":"\u00c7ivi: SGK’da feragat\u0131n bedeli ki\u015fi ba\u015f\u0131na 300 TL"},"content":{"rendered":"

ANKARA (ANKA) – Kamu \u00c7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 HAK Sendikalar\u0131 Konfederasyonu(HAKSEN) Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ayhan \u00c7ivi, Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’nca 21 Aral\u0131k 2008’de yap\u0131lan \u015eef Unvan\u0131na y\u00fckselme s\u0131nav\u0131n\u0131n 7 sorunun hatal\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 sonucunda iptal edilmesiyle ilgili, “Ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan durumun sorumlusu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar de\u011fildir. Do\u011fru d\u00fczg\u00fcn bir s\u0131nav yapmay\u0131 beceremeyen kurum y\u00f6neticileridir. Bu nedenle, iptal edilen 7 soru de\u011ferlendirme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131larak, kalan 73 soruya g\u00f6re yeniden bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r” dedi.
\nHAKSEN Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ayhan \u00c7ivi, “SGK’da \u015eikeli Feragat’\u0131n Bilgi ve Belgesi” konulu bir bas\u0131n toplant\u0131s\u0131 d\u00fczenledi. Bas\u0131n toplant\u0131s\u0131nda konu\u015fan \u00c7ivi, Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca 21 Aral\u0131k 2008’de yap\u0131lan \u015eef Unvan\u0131na y\u00fckselme s\u0131nav\u0131ndaki 80 sorudan 3 sorunun kurum taraf\u0131ndan, 4 sorunun da mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan hatal\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 sonucu s\u0131nav\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn Ankara 5’inci \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 21 May\u0131s 2010 tarihli karar\u0131 ile iptal edildi\u011fini an\u0131msatt\u0131. \u00c7ivi, bir mahkeme karar\u0131 \u00fczerine oynanan oyunlar\u0131n Hukuk Devleti’nin gelece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan endi\u015fe verici oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek, T\u00fcrkiye’de \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan, emekli ve muhta\u00e7 milyonlarca insan\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131k ve sosyal g\u00fcvenli\u011finin teslim edildi\u011fi bir kamu kurumunda \u015eef g\u00f6revi i\u00e7in ya\u015fananlar\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc oldu\u011funu kaydetti. Somut veriler \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fcklerini dile getiren \u00c7ivi, \u015f\u00f6yle konu\u015ftu:
\n“SGK Y\u00f6netiminde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 ve emeklileri temsilen g\u00f6rev yapanlara sesleniyorum; sizler ne i\u00e7in oradas\u0131n\u0131z. Siz kimi temsil ediyorsunuz. Neden iddialar\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in talimat vermiyorsunuz. Daha ne bekliyorsunuz. HAKSEN bu konunun ve sorumlular\u0131n pe\u015fini b\u0131rakmayacakt\u0131r. Ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan durumun sorumlusu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar de\u011fildir. Do\u011fru d\u00fczg\u00fcn bir s\u0131nav yapmay\u0131 beceremeyen kurum y\u00f6neticileridir. Bu nedenle, iptal edilen 7 soru de\u011ferlendirme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131larak, kalan 73 soruya g\u00f6re yeniden bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. De\u011ferlendirme sonucu kamuoyuna a\u00e7\u0131klanarak 273 ki\u015filik listeye giren di\u011fer personelin de \u015eef unvan\u0131na atamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Aksi takdirde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan adaletsizlik, t\u00fcm vicdanlar\u0131 s\u0131zlatmaya devam edecektir. Biz bu konunun pe\u015fini b\u0131rakmayaca\u011f\u0131z. Hakk\u0131 yenen di\u011fer personelin de hakk\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131da arayaca\u011f\u0131z.”<\/p>\n

-KURUM TARAFINDAN HER HANG\u0130 B\u0130R \u0130\u015eLEM YAPILMADI-<\/p>\n

\u0130ptal edilen s\u0131nava T\u00fcrkiye genelinde 949 personelin kat\u0131lma hakk\u0131n\u0131 elde etti\u011fi, s\u0131nav sonucunda atamas\u0131 yap\u0131lan 241 ki\u015finin halen \u00e7e\u015fitli SGK \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinde \u015eef veya M\u00fcd\u00fcr Vekili olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten \u00c7ivi, Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n SGK’ya tebli\u011finden itibaren 30 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde s\u0131nav\u0131n ve s\u0131nav sonucu yap\u0131lan atamalar\u0131n iptali gerekirken kurum taraf\u0131ndan herhangi bir i\u015flem yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydetti. <\/p>\n

-25 TEMMUZDA \u0130DD\u0130ALARIN ARA\u015eTIRILMASINI \u0130STED\u0130K-<\/p>\n

\u00c7ivi, konuya ili\u015fkin HAKSEN’e gelen \u00e7e\u015fitli ihbarlarda temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde davac\u0131n\u0131n feragat etmesi i\u00e7in s\u0131nav sonucu atamas\u0131 yap\u0131lan personelden para toplanarak ilgilinin davadan feragat etmesinin sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. \u00c7ivi, bu nedenle, HAKSEN taraf\u0131ndan 25 Temmuz’da bas\u0131na yans\u0131yan a\u00e7\u0131klamada, iddialar\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve kamuoyunun ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n istendi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatarak, “Konuya ili\u015fkin SGK Bas\u0131n M\u00fc\u015favirli\u011finin 29 Temmuz’daki bas\u0131n duyurusunda Sendikam\u0131z\u0131n iddialar\u0131na cevap olarak, hepimiz taraf\u0131ndan malum olan hukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131klanarak feragat nedeniyle Dan\u0131\u015ftay karar\u0131na kadar mevcut durumun devam\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca sendikam\u0131z sorumsuzlukla su\u00e7lanarak, bilgi ve belgeye dayanmadan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n kurumu ve s\u00f6z konusu personelleri t\u00f6hmet alt\u0131nda b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, itibar\u0131n\u0131 hedef ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015fleridir” diye konu\u015ftu. <\/p>\n

-SGK \u00c7ALI\u015eANLARI HAKSEN’E KAR\u015eI KI\u015eKIRTTI-<\/p>\n

Kamuda \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc bir sivil toplum kurulu\u015fu olduklar\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayan \u00c7ivi, sorumluluklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ok iyi bildiklerini kaydetti. “\u015eunu da biliyoruz ki biz sorumluluklar\u0131m\u0131z i\u015fverenden de \u00f6\u011frenecek de\u011filiz. Oysa a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131zda herhangi bir ki\u015fi yada kurum su\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f, sadece iddialar\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istenmi\u015ftir” diyen \u00c7ivi, SGK’n\u0131n bu iddialar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rmak yerine kendisine bilgi ve belge ula\u015fmas\u0131 halinde gerekli yasal takibat\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 HAKSEN’e kar\u015f\u0131 k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtan ifadeler kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydetti. <\/p>\n

-B\u0130Z MEMURUN ARKA BAH\u00c7ES\u0130Y\u0130Z-<\/p>\n

\u00c7ivi, “S\u0131nav\u0131 HAKSEN yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, davay\u0131 HAKSEN a\u00e7mam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, iptal karar\u0131n\u0131 HAKSEN vermemi\u015ftir, davadan HAKSEN feragat etmemi\u015ftir” ifadelerini kullanarak, t\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n tek muhatab\u0131n\u0131n SGK Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. \u00c7ivi, SGK’n\u0131n ba\u015flataca\u011f\u0131 inceleme sonucu t\u00fcm ger\u00e7ekleri ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmak varken HAKSEN’i su\u00e7lamas\u0131n\u0131n nedenini anlayamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 kaydederek, “Bize intikal eden ihbarlar muhtemelen di\u011fer sendikalara da intikal etmi\u015ftir. Ancak konuyu sadece bizim g\u00fcndeme getirmemiz belli ki birilerini rahats\u0131z etmi\u015ftir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc biz di\u011ferlerinden farkl\u0131y\u0131z. Biz hak ve eme\u011fin sendikas\u0131y\u0131z. Biz memurun arka bah\u00e7esiyiz” \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu. <\/p>\n

-DAVAYI A\u00c7ARKEN \u0130STEM YANLI\u015e MI YAZILDI-<\/p>\n

\u00c7ivi, SGK’n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda “Yasin Bayar’\u0131n vekili Av. Burhan Deveci 7 Temmuz 2010 tarihinde Ankara 5’inci \u0130dare Mahkemesine ve Kurum Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131za sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7esinde, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin s\u0131nav\u0131n iptal edilmesinde hukuki yarar\u0131 kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve bu karar ile s\u0131nav\u0131n iptal edilmesinin, kazanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu s\u0131nav\u0131 kazanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, davas\u0131ndan feragat etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir” denildi\u011fini an\u0131msatarak, “Avukata soruyorum; Herhangi bir avukat\u0131 olmadan iptal karar\u0131 alan davac\u0131, neden feragat dilek\u00e7esi i\u00e7in avukat tutma gere\u011fi duymu\u015ftur? Davay\u0131 a\u00e7arken istemi mi yanl\u0131\u015f yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r? Dava sonucu ba\u015fka nas\u0131l bir karar bekliyordu da sonu\u00e7tan memnun olmayarak feragat etmi\u015ftir? Feragat sonucu davac\u0131 i\u00e7in nas\u0131l bir hukuki yarar olu\u015fmu\u015ftur?
\nBu sorular\u0131n cevaplar\u0131, iddialar\u0131n da cevaplar\u0131d\u0131r” diye konu\u015ftu. <\/p>\n

-K\u0130\u015e\u0130 BA\u015eI 300 TL YATIRILDI, 30 B\u0130N TL TOPLANDI-<\/p>\n

\u00c7ivi, kendilerine ula\u015fan bilgilerin bu iddialar\u0131n ne kadar ciddiye al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini vurgulayarak, iptal edilen s\u0131nav sonucu \u015fef g\u00f6revine atanan pek \u00e7ok personel taraf\u0131ndan vekalet \u00fccreti ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda T\u00fcrkiye Vak\u0131flar Bankas\u0131’na ki\u015fi ba\u015f\u0131na 300 TL para yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 7-8 Temmuz 2010 tarihlerindeki iki g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde hesapta 30 bin TL civar\u0131nda bir mebla\u011f\u0131n topland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. \u00c7ivi, “Hatta baz\u0131 ki\u015filerin “\u015eef s\u0131nav\u0131n\u0131n iptalinin feragati i\u00e7in \u00f6denen vekalet bedeli’ \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klama yazd\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
\n\u00c7o\u011funlukla a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda “vekalet \u00fccreti’ yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen hesap sahibinin avukat olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, hesaptan 7 Temmuz g\u00fcn\u00fc mesai bitmeden \u00f6nce 19 bin TL \u00e7ekildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 vekilinin feragat dilek\u00e7esini de 7 Temmuz tarihinde verdi\u011fi malumdur. T\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n bir tesad\u00fcf olmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Masum insanlar elde ettikleri haklar\u0131 kaybetmemek i\u00e7in istismar edilmi\u015ftir. Kirli bir oyuna alet edilmi\u015flerdir” ifadelerini kulland\u0131.(ANKA)
\n(EBR\/\u00d6MR)<\/p>\n

\u0130\u00e7erik Galerisi<\/h2>\n

\"\u00c7ivi:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Genel Ba\u015fkan Ayhan \u00c7ivi, Davac\u0131n\u0131n, SGK \u015eef s\u0131nav\u0131n\u0131n iptal karar\u0131ndan feragat etmesi i\u00e7in s\u0131nav\u0131 kazananlardan ki\u015fi ba\u015f\u0131na 300 TL istendi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1061,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1060\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1061"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haksen.org.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}